Nobody "outed" Plame... except Novak
Published on July 12, 2006 By Daiwa In Politics
Bob Novak has finally broken his silence and revealed that noone gave him Valerie Plame's name. His primary source, who remains unnamed, apparently made an inadvertent & passsing reference to Wilson's wife having had a role in his getting the Niger assignment during the course of a lengthy interview that covered a number of other subjects. Novak picked up on the comment, looked up Wilson's wife's name in Who's Who (there's tight cover, for ya), called the CIA & asked if she worked there, was told she did indeed. He apparently then related this information to Rove during a phone conversation, who said only that he'd "heard the same thing," without ever mentioning her name.

There was never an orchestrated administration "operation" to "discredit" Wilson by "leaking" his wife's name & role in the Niger mission. They merely defended themselves against Wilson's false accusations, and the likes of the NYT ginned up the whole "campaign to discredit Wilson" out of otherwise thin air, jumping to that conclusion on the slimmest of suppositions. But because that supposition fit with the biased opinion of the motivations & intent of this administration, it was simply assumed (and proclaimed) to be true. I, for one, never understood how revealing Plame's identity would undermine Wilson or his claims, anyway; one simply has nothing to with the other and we now know that the revelation of her identity was simply seized upon as a pretext for the claims of a smear campaign against Wilson. There is a looking glass quality to this whole thing - the attack press conducting a "campaign" to undermine & counter an alleged "campaign" to discredit Wilson that was a figment of the attack press's fevered imagination in the first place.

All of which helps explain why the only thing Fitzgerald could do was try to trip someone up under oath.

Comments
on Jul 12, 2006
Smart man that Novak! Stupid Newspapers! But that seems to be the norm.
on Jul 12, 2006
I don't believe Novak did anything wrong here. Apparently Fitzgerald agrees. It appears that Novak was under the legitimate impression that her identity was not classified; indeed the CIA itself had confirmed her name & employment, so he can't be accused of disclosing secret information (unlike the NYT).

However, I kinda like the idea of his head on a spike. Modern society is so boring and lines of authority so blurred without heads on spikes.
on Jul 12, 2006
There is a looking glass quality to this whole thing


enuff--i believe--to justify me using one of charles lutwidge dodgson's best-loved signature devices (along with others) to frame two or three previous musings on the matter.

i hate to get in a rut here, but this latest revelation puts me in mind of both the mad hatter's tea party and the red queen's croquet match.

i can't help wondering why novak, ms miller, rove, libby, cheney, bush, mclellan had to be forced--at considerable cost in time, energy and money--to be forthcoming and candid about such an innocent misunderstanding.

not that i don't see an upside if every minute they were engaged in inflicting their foolishness on us diverted and prevented them from doing additional damage to the situations in iraq, north korea and iran.
on Jul 12, 2006
Possibly the biggest non-story to ever cause so much press. ;~D
on Jul 12, 2006
i can't help wondering why novak, ms miller, rove, libby, cheney, bush, mclellan had to be forced--at considerable cost in time, energy and money--to be forthcoming and candid about such an innocent misunderstanding.

Come on, kb. You ain't that dense. The press & the CIA demanded the inquisition. As things have turned out, they were forthcoming. But then, maybe this was the point:

not that i don't see an upside if every minute they were engaged in inflicting their foolishness on us diverted and prevented them from doing additional damage to the situations in iraq, north korea and iran.


on Jul 17, 2006
Now that we know that the whole thing was unorchestrated & that nobody intentionally "leaked" a covert agent's name, that hasn't stopped the Bush-haters. In fact, they just work a new angle so they can rehash the whole thing with an extra-large serving of the house spin, courtesy of Chris Matthews:

I tried to link directly to it, but the link doesn't want to work. It's MSNBC.COM, the Hardball segment on "What did Novak Reveal?"

I apologize for the ad they make you watch first, but the segment is pretty funny once you get past that.