Hypocrisy 'Inside the Ropes'
Published on June 23, 2009 By Daiwa In Politics

Remember the routine media disgust & disdain for Bush's golf outings?  How sarcastically critical the news accounts were when something big happened while he was on the course?  Even when he decided to stop playing golf out of respect for the troops in harm's way, he was denounced as 'shallow.'

Suddenly it's all good.


Comments
on Jun 23, 2009

Time and again I say and Obama comfirms that he is not change, he is business as usual and so many out there won't care because it's just golf, at least with Obama it's just golf. This change is great.

on Jun 23, 2009

 

You know, when I read mooning...I was not thinking of this. Blegh, the media will be the media. This really does dampen my prospects on perhaps working/freelancing for them.

 

~Alderic

on Jun 23, 2009

The only change you can believe in is the media change from criticizing Bush at every level to the sucking up to Obama on every level. Even Obama joked about it recently at a media dinner, and these same fools in the audience yucked it up as he made fun of their slobbering @ss kissing. How pathetic.

on Jun 23, 2009

The only change you can believe in is the media change from criticizing Bush at every level to the sucking up to Obama on every level. Even Obama joked about it recently at a media dinner, and these same fools in the audience yucked it up as he made fun of their slobbering @ss kissing. How pathetic.

 

I don't see it as arse kissing, so much as...it's what gets them ratings. I mean come on, a prime example of it is when it comes to hollywood celebrities. (Lindsay lohan, Britney spears, et al.) They thrive/feed off of the...hype.

 

~Alderic

on Jun 23, 2009

don't see it as arse kissing, so much as...

When Obama jokes about rolling over in bed and Brian Williams is there... well you can get the picture, or choose to ignore it.

on Jun 23, 2009

When Obama jokes about rolling over in bed and Brian Williams is there... well you can get the picture, or choose to ignore it.

 

I see that more as a rather bad attempt at humor, but then again what do I know right? Not like I'm studying journalism, or at the most of above average intellect, etc. Y'all are always so apocalyptic...geesh, that's a coronary waiting to happen. .

I will admit; however, that I did not get to see that deal in its entirety. (Mind linking?)

 

Be well,~Alderic

on Jun 23, 2009

You know it would be simple (and truthful) to respond to Daiwa's article with a "yeah, yeah we all know it's happening", or "we've see stuff like this before". But you know what? It does bare mentioning, because 6 months or six years from now some loon is going to deny it ever happened. We can't make it acceptable for any political party to forget their complaints when their guy is in charge. Maybe things won't change much but maybe a few will learn not to throw rocks from their glass houses.

on Jun 23, 2009

You know it would be simple (and truthful) to respond to Daiwa's article with a "yeah, yeah we all know it's happening", or "we've see stuff like this before". But you know what? It does bare mentioning, because 6 months or six years from now some loon is going to deny it ever happened. We can't make it acceptable for any political party to forget their complaints when their guy is in charge. Maybe things won't change much but maybe a few will learn not to throw rocks from their glass houses.

 

Sure it would, but when is anything simple? When is anything intelligent, or logical? We live in a friggin world that isn't simple, and constantly stupid. You would need more than your hands and feet to count the number of people live in irrationality an/or stupidity. We've got idiots on one side claiming one thing, and idiots on the the other said claiming something else. (I'm not only talking about the politicians)

So yeah, it would be simpler, but when is the world ever simple? Or honest? Or driven by accountability?

 

Be well, ~Alderic

 

 

 

on Jun 23, 2009

About Obama's "jokes', I'm sorry guys, but as a comedian, Obama is a really good fly killer. The guys jokes were so badly presented that it was funny to see how unfunny his jokes were. He should definitely stick to his teleprompter.

We've got idiots on one side claiming one thing, and idiots on the the other said claiming something else. (I'm not only talking about the politicians)

You know whats really funny, half the time the ididots on each side are actually in agreement but continue to argue as if they are debating different points of view. Kinda like one side saying liberty and the other saying freedom. They both almost literally want the same thing yet they fight as if one thinks the other wants slavery.

on Jun 23, 2009

You know whats really funny, half the time the ididots on each side are actually in agreement but continue to argue as if they are debating different points of view. Kinda like one side saying liberty and the other saying freedom. They both almost literally want the same thing yet they fight as if one thinks the other wants slavery.

 

In my opinion, it's a funny that is borderline pathetic. I mean really, come on. The little letter next to the name doesn't really mean much difference, so why the bs?

 

About Obama's "jokes', I'm sorry guys, but as a comedian, Obama is a really good fly killer. The guys jokes were so badly presented that it was funny to see how unfunny his jokes were. He should definitely stick to his teleprompter.

Yeah, he isn't that great.

on Jun 24, 2009

Yeah, he isn't that great.

You gotta admit, Bush did much better delivering jokes. Not that his face and that up and down motion of his head when ever he tried to be funny didn't help.

The little letter next to the name doesn't really mean much difference, so why the bs?

Yea, I don't see much point in that anymore either. There are times you are reading a story on the news and can't help but this "he/she's gotta be a republican/democrat" only to find out the are from the opposite party. Sometimes I can't even tell the difference between doing what they believe in vs doing whats best for them, because in most cases these are not the same thing.

on Jun 24, 2009

You gotta admit, Bush did much better delivering jokes. Not that his face and that up and down motion of his head when ever he tried to be funny didn't help.


Mhmm, he was definitely better at telling and being a joke.

ea, I don't see much point in that anymore either. There are times you are reading a story on the news and can't help but this "he/she's gotta be a republican/democrat" only to find out the are from the opposite party. Sometimes I can't even tell the difference between doing what they believe in vs doing whats best for them, because in most cases these are not the same thing.

 

Indeed; it's times like that I really wish we had statesmen, not politicians.

 

~Alderic