So Long, Cox
Published on May 13, 2012 By Daiwa In Movies & TV & Books

After months (OK, years) of fuming at my cable bill, asking myself why I'm paying $92 a month for cable TV (with NO premium channels) when I hardly watch anything but the Science Channel & NatGeo anymore, I finally broke out of my inertia & pulled the plug.

Fortunately, digital antennas have improved to the point that OTA HD channel reception is as good as cable or dish, at least here.  

We have 4 TV's in the house (2 of which were old CRT behemoths until earlier this year).  I now have 3 of them on $30 RCA flat-box antennas and one on a $13 RCA rabbit ear version, all with great reception.  I bought 2 Apple TV's and a Netflix subscription.

Old = $1100 a year (it's always frosted me they charge monthly rent for the remotes, FCOL).

New = $350 one time cost & $8 a month, $96 a year.

I think I like New.  I'll add stuff a la carte for sports & series I really want to watch (like Hell on Wheels) & I'll be able to watch them on my schedule - don't even need a DVR.

Now to figure out what else to do with all that money I'm saving.  After I finish kicking myself for not doing this long ago.


Comments (Page 3)
4 Pages1 2 3 4 
on May 20, 2012

ice27828 get yourself a subscription to MLB.TV, it's cheaper then getting it on Direct TV (satellite) and you can watch archieved games.  Check it out if you like baseball.  The only games you will not see are those that are blacked out in your area (ZIP Code) because you are in the viewing area.

 

 

on May 21, 2012

DaveBax
I must be really lucky. I have Verizon. They supply my Internet, Phone and TV. My internet speed is 35/35 mbps and actually it runs at higher speeds as the 35/35 is the lowest it will go. My phone has all the goodies like caller ID, voice, etc. The TV has more HD channels then I can watch with Starz, Sports package, Max, Encore, and all the standard channels. The great part is I have never lost service. It may sound like a lot of money to some but it's only $130/Mo. Also it includes a HD/DVR box and an additional HD box for the second TV. I have two major compaines in my area of NJ and they are always trying to out do one another which works out for the customers. This isn't a plug or anything like that as Comcast also has a good package but the one I have is just a bit better for the price. I for one couldn't go back to watch anything if it wasn't in HD and especially the sports.

I had the same package - until I changed Voice. And then only because Vonage has free over seas calling. I have had NO (Emphasize NO) problems with any of their services.  Others have told me horror stories, but I am not going back to Comcast anytime soon!

on May 21, 2012

Dr Guy
Others have told me horror stories, but I am not going back to Comcast anytime soon!

I thibk the horro stories may come from certain locations. I had none from either but very happy with Verizon. My situation may be a bit different from many. I'm retired, live alone since my wife passed, and as long as I have my present services it helps me stay busy. I have no need for those fancy cell 4G phones but knowing from my grandchildren that is all they know and those phones can do a lot. I enjoy being home so I get to watch and do things on bigger screens. lol. It is really something however the way the world is thinking and going.

on May 27, 2012

@Philly A season of MLB is like 120 bucks, although because basic cable don't come with sports channel well not in Canada, by the time I add sports channels and tax I am probably looking at the same price for the same period of time.

I don't understand why people get bundles, are they really cheaper?

on Jun 03, 2012

to me, TV is dead. I just upgraded my net connection to optic-fiber one, 40/20 Mbit no FUP for 12 EUROs per month and i am going totally rely on that - even for watching TV stuff. Sopcast FTW!

on Jun 03, 2012

Timmaigh
to me, TV is dead. I just upgraded my net connection to optic-fiber one, 40/20 Mbit no FUP for 12 EUROs per month and i am going totally rely on that - even for watching TV stuff. Sopcast FTW!

Sigh. Fiber is a pain to work with but worth all the results.

on Jun 03, 2012

I haven't had a TV since I moved out of my parents house at 19.

on Jun 05, 2012

DaveBax
I have no need for those fancy cell 4G phones but knowing from my grandchildren that is all they know and those phones can do a lot

Put a rotary phone in front of them and see how bewildered they become.

on Jun 05, 2012

Dr Guy

Quoting DaveBax, reply 34 I have no need for those fancy cell 4G phones but knowing from my grandchildren that is all they know and those phones can do a lot

Put a rotary phone in front of them and see how bewildered they become.

Pfah, give them a telegraph and a morse code chart!

on Oct 16, 2012

I'm glad I don't live where you guys are at.

 

I'm in Canada and my cable charges are 160$ a month that includes digital tv high speed 1.5 connection and local phone.

 

60% of my charges is internet. We don't have unlimited connection here so I have to pay by quantity. I have three kids with ipods and wifi connected. It gets expensive when I have to pay for 200 gig download a month. Streaming costs a lot for us Canadians.

 

 

on Oct 16, 2012

6 months later.  New hardware costs now more than paid for by the monthly savings and still happy as a clam.  Don't miss the cable channels a bit.  Happened to be in a hotel for the past 4 days & channel surfing fully reinforced my decision - wasn't diddlysquat worth watching except football.  History, TLC, Discovery (the ones I used to really enjoy) - all have gone to hell, have practically nothing relating to their channel names & are completely worthless now.

on Oct 17, 2012

Glad to hear its working out for you.

Now to figure out what else to do with all that money I'm saving.

Upgrade the old CRT behemoths to new svelte LCDs?

on Oct 17, 2012

The CRT's were retired just before the switch.  One was a ~29" JVC box that weighed at least 100#, purchased prior to 1990.  We've come a long way.  The cost of these displays is dropping like a rock and they're getting thinner by the minute.

on Oct 18, 2012

I wish they'd work on making better pictures than just making them lighter and thinner.

on Oct 19, 2012

Well, can't blame the display for the content.  57 channels & nothin' on... but nothin' never looked better!

4 Pages1 2 3 4