The Left's New Bitch
Published on January 31, 2005 By Daiwa In Politics
Well, it didn't take long.

Just to be sure the joy didn't get out of hand, and since they've lost another wrongly-predicted disaster to complain about, some from the left have already moved on to their next battleground - what they all call the Absence of an Exit Strategy.

Never mind that there is a public timetable, adhered to to the day so far, for all the steps in the transition to a fully independent Iraqi State: Election of a Constitutional Congress, a deadline for development of a written Constitution, a fixed date for submitting that Constitution to a vote of the Iraqi people, a fixed date for election of a permanent representative Assembly. But Bush has no Exit Strategy.

The training and "standing up" of Iraqi security forces, a very difficult proposition, logistically and psychologically, is moving forward and finally gaining serious momentum. It's been slower than hoped, but we are talking about human beings here, not Iraqi robots, most of whom have been subjected to a kind of oppressive rule none of us can imagine and who might have a difficult time reasserting themselves in their own society. No one could know, going in, all that would be needed to reconstitute the Iraqi security apparatus, in terms of time & resources, but the commitment to get the job done has always been there. But Bush has no Exit Strategy.

Finally, some people seem to forget the only strategy that matters - Victory. Bush has said all along what our plan would be - to leave when the Iraqis no longer need our military support and to work to make that happen in the shortest time possible. But he has no Exit Strategy.

Of course, when pressed, the folks from the left I've heard pontificating today say, "OK, we'll concede that all that constitutes an Exit Strategy, but it's not happening quickly enough." Or, "It needs a more intensified international diplomatic effort." As if Zarqawi, et al, give a rip about diplomacy.

Cheers,
Daiwa


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 05, 2005
Reply #15 By: Deference - 2/5/2005 6:02:21 PM
You're right, drmiler, I don't know for certain that there is no exit strategy, but for the administration to at least say that they did would quell some criticism. The fact that they won't even get that close kind'a tells you something.


As someone who been in the military? Yeah it tells me something. It's probably a secret.
on Feb 07, 2005
def -

About that blank check thing - you can choose to look at it that way, but what sort of check was Churchill writing in 1939? And Roosevelt in 1941? Did either announce in 1942 an Exit Strategy for WWII? What's the point of a telegraphed Exit Strategy? Aside from giving the political opposition potential ammo. I think what their reticence tells us is that they've been pilloried every time any prediction has failed to come to pass and had the fact used against them mercilessly, so they've decided to go out of the prediction business. The left has been playing a relentless gotcha game, you have to admit. Besides, the very phrase has the psychological connotation of declaring defeat, folding our tent and coming home.

There is virtually no trust between the parties on matters of national security any more, which I find sad and disturbing. I'd feel a whole lot better if I was hearing from Democrats that the Administration had been keeping them fully informed as to the progress in Iraq and the near- and long-term plans for prosecuting the war and winding it down and that, whether they agree with the particulars or not, a Strategy for Victory exists. We don't need an Exit Strategy if we achieve our objectives. It would be both politically and strategically foolish to lay all our cards on the table before the betting is done.

Cheers,
Daiwa
on Feb 07, 2005
Good points Daiwa, and some I'd like to answer to as soon as I get a moment...

Keep bloggin!
2 Pages1 2